White-tailed Deer Semen Auction Data: A Hedonic Analysis

Authors

  • Kenneth R. Barnes Sam Houston State University
  • Foy D. Mills, Jr. Sam Houston State University
  • L. A. Wolfskill Sam Houston State University
  • Shyam S. Nair Sam Houston State University
  • Jason R. Franken Western Illinois University
  • Doug R. Ullrich Sam Houston State University

Keywords:

Hedonic Price Analysis, White-tailed Deer, Semen Prices, Cervid, Auction

Abstract

In 2008, the cervid (i.e., deer) production and hunting industry had an economic impact of $318.4 million in Texas and $3 billion in the US. Antlers of whitetail bucks are prized trophies for hunters. Hence, breeders make great investments to manage genetic potential for antler growth in their herds. Sire selection accounts for up to 90% of genetic changes in managed livestock herds. Therefore, researchers have investigated the value of sire characteristics using hedonic analysis of auction data for race horses, beef cattle, and dairy bull semen. Similar hedonic analyses have evaluated attributes of hunting leases and permits. However, no hedonic studies have been conducted on auction data for semen originating from confined white-tailed deer farms in Texas. Publicly available data on semen prices, buck antler scores, and whether the buck was considered typical or non-typical were collected from the Texas Deer Association. Auction prices ranged from $120/straw to $20,500/straw of semen with a mean of $2499/straw. Modeling price as a function of white-tailed deer characteristics and breeding location indicates significant premiums for higher antler scores (p<0.01), Texas genetics (p<0.01), and deceased bucks (p<0.05). Therefore, breeders may consider these important characteristics in breeding program development.

Author Biographies

Kenneth R. Barnes, Sam Houston State University

Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Technology, Former graduate student

Foy D. Mills, Jr., Sam Houston State University

Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Technology, Professor and Program Leader- Agribusiness

L. A. Wolfskill, Sam Houston State University

Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Technology, Assistant Professor of Agribusiness

Shyam S. Nair, Sam Houston State University

Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Technology, Assistant Professor of Agribusiness

Jason R. Franken, Western Illinois University

School of Agriculture, Assistant Professor of Agribusiness

Doug R. Ullrich, Sam Houston State University

Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Technology, Professor of Agricultural Education

References

Allen T, Howlett D, Southwich R. 2012. Hunting in America. National Shooting Sports Foundation; Assoc of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Southwick Associates.

Anderson DP, Frosch BJ, Outlaw JL. 2008. Economic impact of deer breeding operations in Texas. Texas A&M Univ, College Station:TX Coop Ext.

Anderson DP, Frosch BJ, Outlaw JL. 2007. Economic impact of the United States cervid industry. Dept of Ag Econ, Texas A&M Univ, College Station:TX Coop Ext.

Bowman KR, Ethridge DE. 1992. Characteristic supplies and demands in a hedonic framework: U.S. market for cotton fiber attributes. Am J Ag Econ. 991-1002.

Brorsen WB, Grant WR, Rister EM. 1983. A hedonic price model for rough rice bid/acceptance markets. Am J Ag Econ. 66:156-163. doi:10.2307/1241032.

Brown JN, Rosen SH. 1982. On the estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50:765-768.

Buccola S, Lizuka Y. 1997. Hedonic cost models and the pricing of milk components. Am J Ag Econ. 79:452-462.

Buller V M, Hudson MD, Parkhurst G, Whittington AF. 2006. The impact of hunting package attributes on hunting package prices in Mississippi. Res Rep, MS St Univ.

Carew R, Smith EG. 2004. The value of apple characteristics to wholesalers in western Cananda: hedonic approach. Can J of Plant Sci. 829-835.

Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation. 2013. 2013 sportsmen's economic impact report. Washington: Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation.

DeZelle J. 2009. Property assessment. Westervelt Wildlife. June. Accessed October 21, 2015. Available from: http://www.westerveltwildlife.com/wildlife-services/property-assessment.cfm#.VigtrEZKVNs.

Dhuyvetter KC, Jones J, Marsh LT, Turner T. 2008. Estimating the economic values associated with EPDs for Angus bulls at auction. J Ag Appl Econ. 40:315-333.

Dhuyvetter KC, Douthit M, Kastens TL, Marsh LT, Taylor MR. 2006. Show quality quarter horse auctions: price determinants and buy-back practices. J Ag Res Econ. 31(3):595-615.

Espinosa JA, Goodwin BK. 1991. Hedonic price estimation for Kansas wheat characteristics. Western J Ag Econ. 16:72-85.

Franken JR, Parcell JL. 2012. Factors influencing bull price evidence from Missouri auction data. J Agribusiness. 107-123.

Hussain A, Munn AI, Holland DW, Armstrong JB, Spurlock SR. 2012. Economic impact of wildlife-associated recreation expenditures in the Southeast United States: A general equilibrum analysis. J Ag Appl Econ. 63-82.

International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2002. Economic importance of hunting in America. Intl Assoc of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Florida: Southwick Associates, Inc.

Issuu. 2015. Press & media. Accessed November 2015. Available from: http://issuu.com.

Koch SI, Vickner SS. 2001. Hedonic pricing, information, and the market for Thoroughbred yearlings. J Agribusiness. 19(2):173-189.

Ladd G, Gibson C. 1978. Microeconomics of technical change: what's a better animal worth. Am Journal Ag Econ. 60(2):236-240.

Lancaster KJ. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J Pol Econ. 74:132-157.

Lansford NH, Freeman DW, Topliff DR, Walker OL. 1998. Hedonic pricing of race-bred yearling quarter horses produced by quarter horse sires and dams. J Agribusiness. 169-185.

Maynard LJ, Stoeppel KM. 2007. Hedonic price analysis of Thoroughbred broodmares in foal. J Agribusiness. 25(2):181-195.

McConnell KE, Strand IE. 1999. Hedonic prices for fish: tuna prices in Hawaii. Am J Ag Econ. 82:133-144.

Miller MW, Thorne TE. 1993. Captive cervids as potential sources of disease for North America's wild cervid populations: avenues, implications, and preventive management. Trans North Am Wildlife Natl Res Conf. 460-467.

Neibergs SJ. 2001. A hedonic price analysis of Thoroughbred broodmare characteristics. Agribusiness. 17(2):299-314.

Norwood BF, Lusk JL. 2008. Agricultural Marketing and Price Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education, Inc.

Parcell JL, Schroeder TC. 2007. Hedonic retail beef and pork product prices. J Ag Appl Econ. 39(1):29-46.

Poerwanto D, Stowe JC. 2010. The relationship between sire representation and average yearling prices in the Thoroughbred industry. J Agribusiness. 61-74.

Purvis J. 2014. Big game harvest survey results 2000-01 through 2013-2014. TPWD. Available from: https://tpwd.texas.gov/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_rp_w7000_0718b.pdf.

Rhyne JD, Munn IA, Hussian I. 2009. Hedonic analysis of auctioned hunting leases: a case study of Mississippi Sixteenth Section Lands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 227-239.

Richards TJ, Jeffrey SR. 1996. Hedonic pricing of dairy bulls - an alternative index of genetic merit. Can J Ag Econ. 44:251-264.

Robbins M, Kennedy PE. 2010. Buyer behavior in a regional Thoroughbred yearling market. Appl Econ. 969-977.

Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure Competition. J Pol Econ. 82:34-55.

Shaffer D, Kime KF, Harper JK. 2005. Agricultural alternatives: Red Deer production. Ag Res and Coop Ext, Penn St Univ, University Park, PA:Penn St Univ Press.

Stowe JC. 2013. Breeding to sell: a hedonic price analysis of leading Thoroughbred sire stud fees. J Appl Econ. 45(7):877-885. doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.613776.

Stowe JC, Ajello B. 2010. A hedonic price analysis of differentiated products of unknown quality: freshman sire stud fees in the Thoroughbred breeding industry. J Agribusiness. 19-30.

Texas Deer Association. 2013. TDA auctions. Texas Deer Association. Accessed February 2015. Available from: https://www.texasdeerassociation.com/tda-auctions#.ViU5UEZKVNs.

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2015. Total number of permitted facilities in Texas from 1994-2014. Open Records Request, TPWD.

White GR, Zollinger WA, Colyer G. 1993. Choosing and managing young bulls. OR St Univ Ext Pub.

Willard ST, Neuendorff DA, Lewis AW, Randel RD. 2001. A comparison of transvaginal artifical insemination procedures for use in commercially farmed deer. Sumall Ruminant Res. 135-140.

Zhang D, Hussain A, Armstrong JB. 2006. Supply of hunting leases from non-industrial private forest lands in Alabama. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-14

How to Cite

Barnes, K. R., Mills, Jr., F. D., Wolfskill, L. A., Nair, S. S., Franken, J. R., & Ullrich, D. R. (2017). White-tailed Deer Semen Auction Data: A Hedonic Analysis. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 29, 39–51. Retrieved from https://txjanr.agintexas.org/index.php/txjanr/article/view/217

Issue

Section

Research Articles